Sethian and Valentinian: The Two Great Streams of Nag Hammadi Theology
Gnostic Schools: Sethian and Valentinian Traditions in the Nag Hammadi Library presents the two largest and most distinct streams of Gnostic thought preserved in the collection–traditions named, respectively, for the biblical Seth (third son of Adam) and the legendary teacher Valentinus (second-century Christian theologian). These are not merely different opinions but different worlds: Sethian texts present elaborate mythological narratives of cosmic fall and archonic imprisonment, while Valentinian texts construct systematic theologies of sacramental restoration and philosophical recognition. Understanding this diversity is essential for serious engagement with the Nag Hammadi Library, for reading Sethian and Valentinian texts as if they were the same leads only to confusion [1][2].
The Nag Hammadi Library contains texts from multiple schools, with different theologies, different practices, and different approaches to the question of salvation. The two largest streams–Sethian and Valentinian–were first systematically distinguished by Hans-Martin Schenke in his foundational 1974 study, and subsequent scholarship by Einar Thomassen, John D. Turner, and David Brakke has refined our understanding of their distinct characteristics [3][4]. Yet the library also contains Hermetic, Thomasine, wisdom, and apocalyptic texts that defy easy categorisation. This article maps the major schools, clarifies their differences, and provides strategic guidance for reading the library according to tradition rather than treating it as a jumble of disconnected curiosities.
Table of Contents
- Introduction — The Diversity Behind the Label
- Sethian Gnosticism
- Valentinian Gnosticism
- Key Differences Between Sethian and Valentinian Traditions
- Beyond Sethian and Valentinian
- Reading Strategically
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Further Reading
- References and Sources

Introduction — The Diversity Behind the Label
What Are the Gnostic Schools?
The Gnostic schools are distinct religious movements within the broader Nag Hammadi corpus, each with characteristic texts, theological frameworks, and ritual practices. The two largest are the Sethian and Valentinian traditions. Sethianism derives from Jewish apocalyptic speculation on the figure of Seth and presents mythological narratives of cosmic fall and archonic imprisonment. Valentinianism emerges from within second-century Christianity and constructs systematic theologies of sacramental restoration and philosophical recognition.
The major territories: Sethian (mythological, Jewish-roots, cosmic pessimism) → Valentinian (philosophical, Christian-roots, cosmic optimism) → Hermetic (Egyptian-Greek syncretism) → Thomasine (wisdom sayings) → Apocalyptic (visionary ascent). By mapping these schools, the reader gains the navigational clarity necessary for serious engagement with the library [5][6].
“Gnosticism” is a convenient label, but it masks enormous diversity. The Nag Hammadi Library contains texts from multiple schools, with different theologies, different practices, and different approaches to the question of salvation. Understanding this diversity is essential for serious engagement, for the same terms (pleroma, aeon, demiurge) have different connotations in different traditions; the same practices (baptism, ascent) have different meanings; and the same soteriological goal (return to the divine) is reached by different routes. These were different movements with different theologies, practices, and communities–united only by family resemblances, not by identity [7].
Modern scholarship, particularly the work of Hans-Martin Schenke on Sethianism and Einar Thomassen on Valentinianism, has established that these traditions are not minor variations on a single theme but coherent religious systems with distinct historical origins, literary forms, and ritual structures. The result is a nuanced scholarly landscape where “Gnosticism” functions as an umbrella term for a family of related movements rather than a single sectarian identity. For the contemporary reader, this scholarly recovery means that the Nag Hammadi Library is not a filing cabinet of random documents but an archive of distinct spiritual corporations, each with its own administrative protocols and security clearances [8].
Sethian Gnosticism
Sethian Gnosticism is now recognised as the earliest form of Gnosticism for which we possess extensive textual evidence. It appears to antedate and form a partial source for Valentinianism, and it had its roots in a form of Jewish speculation on the figure and function of Sophia, the divine Wisdom of the Hebrew Bible [9].
Key Sethian Texts
The Sethian corpus includes: the Apocryphon of John (NHC II,1; III,1; IV,1), Hypostasis of the Archons (NHC II,4), On the Origin of the World (NHC II,5; XIII,2), Gospel of the Egyptians (NHC III,2; IV,2), Apocalypse of Adam (NHC V,5), Three Steles of Seth (NHC VII,5), Zostrianos (NHC VIII,1), Melchizedek (NHC IX,1), Thought of Norea (NHC IX,2), Marsanes (NHC X,1), Allogenes (NHC XI,3), and Trimorphic Protennoia (NHC XIII,1). Hans-Martin Schenke identified eleven recurrent mythological features that characterise these texts as a coherent system [10].
Mythological Narrative and Jewish Roots
Sethian texts present elaborate cosmological narratives–fall of Sophia, birth of Yaldabaoth, creation of humanity, theft of knowledge. These are stories, not philosophical treatises. The figure of Seth (not prominent in the Bible) becomes central as the spiritual ancestor whose seed the Gnostics identify as their own. Seth intervenes twice in primordial history to save his progeny from the angry world creator and appears for a third time bearing revelation and saving baptism [11].
Primary Source Citation: NHC II,1 11:15-20. “And Yaldabaoth said, ‘I am God and there is no other god beside me,’ for he did not know from whence his strength came.”
The Jewish substratum is unmistakable. Sethianism emerges from Jewish apocalyptic and wisdom traditions, transforming biblical material into Gnostic mythology. The heavenly trinity of Father (Invisible Spirit), Mother (Barbelo), and Son (Autogenes); the Four Luminaries (Harmozel, Oroiael, Daveithe, Eleleth); the evil Demiurge Yaldabaoth–all derive from Jewish exegetical speculation on Genesis, the figure of Sophia, and apocalyptic angelology. This is not a Christian heresy but a Jewish religious competitor that later incorporated Christian elements [12].
Cosmic Pessimism and Elitism
The material world is fundamentally flawed, created by an ignorant or malevolent demiurge, a prison for the divine spark. Escape is the goal. Only the spiritual seed–the descendants of Seth–will be saved; the material and psychic races are doomed or require different soteriologies. This cosmic pessimism distinguishes Sethianism from the more optimistic Valentinian tradition. The world is not a school to graduate from but a prison to break out of–a temporary detention facility established by incompetent cosmic administration [13].
Technical Terminology and Platonism
Sethian texts use distinctive vocabulary–Barbelo, Autogenes, Protophanes, Kalyptos, Yaldabaoth, Saklas, Samael–that can bewilder newcomers. The later Platonizing Sethian treatises (Allogenes, Zostrianos, Marsanes, Three Steles of Seth) employ a wholesale adaptation of ontological and epistemological terms from contemporary Middle Platonic metaphysics. These texts effect a clear rapprochement with technical philosophical vocabulary, presenting the deployment and ontological structuring of the divine world in language borrowed from Platonic schools [14].
Reading Sethian Texts
Start with the Hypostasis of the Archons–most accessible, most narrative, requiring no prior knowledge of Sethian metaphysics. Then read the Apocryphon of John for the full system of divine hierarchy, demiurgical incompetence, and the three natures. Leave Zostrianos, Allogenes, and Marsanes for advanced study; these Platonizing texts demand background in Middle Platonic metaphysics and are severely fragmentary. The descent-pattern texts (Apocryphon of John, Hypostasis of Archons) narrate salvation through a descending revealer; the ascent-pattern texts (Zostrianos, Allogenes, Marsanes) require the visionary to actualise the ascent through cognitive assimilation with transcendent realities [15].

Valentinian Gnosticism
Valentinian Gnosticism emerges from within second-century Christianity, seeking to interpret the biblical tradition esoterically rather than reject it. Valentinus himself was a candidate for the bishopric of Rome around 143 CE, and his followers remained active participants in the public life of the Church until they were eventually expelled. The tradition is more philosophically systematic and theologically optimistic than its Sethian counterpart [16].
Key Valentinian Texts
The Valentinian corpus in Nag Hammadi includes: the Gospel of Truth (NHC I,3; XII,2), Gospel of Philip (NHC II,3), Treatise on the Resurrection (NHC I,4), Tripartite Tractate (NHC I,5), and Interpretation of Knowledge (NHC XI,1). Additional Valentinian material appears in the First Apocalypse of James (NHC V,3) and the Valentinian Exposition (NHC XI,2). These texts represent what Einar Thomassen terms “the Church of the Valentinians”–a community that understood itself as Christian, participated in mainstream ecclesiastical life, and reserved its deeper mysteries for private meetings [17].
Philosophical System and Christian Roots
Valentinian texts tend toward systematic theology rather than mythology. They engage with Platonic metaphysics, Stoic ethics, and contemporary philosophy. Jesus is central, though reinterpreted–not merely a revealer but the Saviour who descends from the Pleroma to impart true knowledge of the divine. The Tripartite Tractate presents the most comprehensive Valentinian system, describing the generation of the Pleroma, the fall of Sophia, the creation of the material world, and the Saviour’s mission to restore the spiritual seed [18].
Primary Source Citation: NHC I,3 16:31-33. “Error became angry because it had come into being without volition, and it did not know the one from whom it had come. And the truth is that it will be dissolved on the last day.”
The Christian engagement is explicit. Valentinians saw Christ not primarily as a sacrifice for sin but as a revealer of divine truth. His life and teachings symbolise the awakening of the divine within. The death and resurrection narratives were interpreted allegorically, pointing to spiritual transformation rather than mere historical events. The Treatise on the Resurrection explicitly rejects fleshly resurrection as “disgusting,” presenting resurrection as the transformation of the spiritual nature into its primordial state–a swallowing of the visible by the invisible [19].
Cosmic Optimism and Inclusivity
While the material world is inferior to the spiritual, it is not evil. The fall is more like forgetting than catastrophe; salvation is recognition rather than escape. Valentinianism recognises three classes of human–spiritual (pneumatic), psychic (psychic), and material (hylic)–each with appropriate soteriology. All will eventually be saved, though through different paths. The pneumatics are saved by nature and gnosis; the psychics through faith and sacramental participation; the hylics through the general restoration of all things. This is not the selective evacuation of Sethian elitism but the corporate restructuring of the entire cosmos [20].
Sacramental Theology
Valentinian texts emphasise ritual–baptism, chrism, eucharist, bridal chamber–as means of receiving and expressing divine grace. The Gospel of Philip describes five “mysteries” or sacraments: baptism, anointing, redemption, eucharist, and the bridal chamber (nymphon). The bridal chamber is the highest and most mysterious sacrament, representing the restoration of primordial wholeness. Sacraments were seen as symbols and images of the internal process of redemption: “Truth did not come into the world naked. Rather it came in prototypes and images” (NHC II,3 67:9-12). This is the sacramental filing system–the progressive initiations that grant the practitioner security clearance through each department of the divine administration [21].
Reading Valentinian Texts
Start with the Gospel of Truth–most beautiful, most accessible, a poetic meditation on the terror of separation and the joy of return. Then read the Gospel of Philip for sacramental theology and the mystery of the bridal chamber. The Treatise on the Resurrection offers pastoral application–a letter to Rheginos consoling him for his son’s death with the assurance that resurrection is already accomplished for the spiritual nature. The Tripartite Tractate provides systematic theology for advanced readers, though its length and complexity demand patience [22].
Key Differences Between Sethian and Valentinian Traditions
Recognising the distinction between Sethian and Valentinian traditions allows appreciation of each on its own terms. The following comparisons map the major points of divergence [23].
Origins and Historical Roots
Sethianism emerges from Jewish apocalyptic and wisdom traditions, transforming biblical material into Gnostic mythology. The Jewish substratum is unmistakable: speculation on Genesis, the figure of Sophia, apocalyptic angelology, and the elevation of Seth as spiritual progenitor. It is a Jewish religious competitor that later incorporated Christian elements through editorial glosses and framing dialogues.
Valentinianism emerges from within Christianity, seeking to interpret the biblical tradition esoterically rather than reject it. Valentinus was a Christian teacher in Rome, and his followers considered themselves part of the broader Church. The tradition engages with the New Testament, the Pauline epistles, and Johannine theology, offering allegorical readings that preserve the biblical framework while transforming its meaning.
Literary Style and Presentation
Sethian texts present mythological narratives–stories of divine fall, demiurgical creation, and primordial history. The Apocryphon of John, Hypostasis of the Archons, and On the Origin of the World are essentially creation myths that retell Genesis from a Gnostic perspective. Even the Platonizing treatises (Zostrianos, Allogenes, Marsanes) retain mythological names and baptismal imagery despite their philosophical vocabulary.
Valentinian texts tend toward systematic theology and philosophical exposition. The Tripartite Tractate is a comprehensive cosmological treatise; the Gospel of Truth is a poetic meditation on soteriology; the Treatise on the Resurrection is a pastoral letter. The style is discursive, reflective, and explicitly engaged with contemporary philosophical categories.
Cosmological Attitude
Sethianism views the material world as a prison created by an incompetent or malevolent demiurge. The cosmos is fundamentally flawed, and escape is the goal. Yaldabaoth’s creation is a counterfeit, a parody of divine intention, and the material body is a prison for the divine spark.
Valentinianism views the material world as inferior to the spiritual but not evil. The cosmos is a school to graduate from rather than a prison to break out of. The fall of Sophia is more like a miscalculation than a catastrophe, and the material world retains traces of divine order that can be recognised and restored.
Soteriological Approach
Sethian salvation is liberation through knowledge–the gnosis that reveals the prison and provides the passwords for escape. The soteriology is elitist: only the spiritual seed of Seth will be saved. The descent-pattern texts narrate salvation through a descending revealer who defeats archonic powers; the ascent-pattern texts require the visionary to actualise the ascent through cognitive assimilation with transcendent realities.
Valentinian salvation is recognition and restoration–the anamnesis that recalls the soul to its divine origin. The soteriology is inclusive: all three natures (pneumatic, psychic, hylic) have appropriate paths to salvation. The pneumatics are saved by nature and gnosis; the psychics through faith and sacraments; the hylics through the eventual apokatastasis of all things.
Christological Framework
Sethian Christology presents Jesus as a revealer, sometimes docetic–the divine Saviour who does not truly suffer but only appears to do so. The Apocalypse of Peter describes the laughing Saviour above the cross while a substitute suffers below. Jesus is one avatar among many of the true saviour, whether Seth, Allogenes, or the heavenly Adam.
Valentinian Christology presents Jesus as Saviour, incarnate though reinterpreted. The Saviour descends from the Pleroma, assumes flesh to be like those he came to save, and through his resurrection transforms death into a transition stage to spiritual immortality. The incarnation is real but the flesh is spiritual–the Logos and his spiritual children provide the Saviour’s body, not ordinary human flesh.
Ritual Practice
Sethian ritual centres on baptism and visionary ascent. The Five Seals constitute a baptismal ascent ritual; the Three Steles of Seth are liturgical hymns for celestial navigation; Zostrianos undergoes multiple immersions to pass through aeonic checkpoints. The ritual is apotropaic–designed to protect the initiate from archonic interference and grant passage through cosmic jurisdictions.
Valentinian ritual centres on multiple sacraments. Baptism, chrism, eucharist, redemption, and bridal chamber form a progressive initiation into the Pleroma. The eucharist is the wedding-feast of the saved; the bridal chamber is the imposition of hands that unites the initiate with their angelic counterpart. The ritual is communal and celebratory–designed to restore the divided self to primordial wholeness through symbolic participation.
Theological Optimism
Sethianism is limited in optimism–elitist, pessimistic about the material world, and selective in salvation. Only the immovable race of Seth will be saved; the hylic nature perishes. The eschatological hope is the defeat of the archons and the gathering of the spiritual seed, not the restoration of all things.
Valentinianism is greater in optimism–universalist, moderately positive about the cosmos, and inclusive in salvation. All natures will eventually return to the divine source, though through different paths and times. The eschatological hope is the apokatastasis–the restoration of all things to their primordial unity.

Beyond Sethian and Valentinian
The Nag Hammadi Library also contains texts that do not fit neatly into either Sethian or Valentinian categories. These additional traditions demonstrate the full diversity of the collection [24].
Hermetic Texts
The Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth (NHC VI,6), Prayer of Thanksgiving (NHC VI,7), and Asclepius (NHC VI,8) represent Egyptian-Greek wisdom, not specifically Christian or Jewish. They present a universal spirituality focused on direct experience, cosmic sympathy, and the soul’s return to divine source through ritual ascent and communal prayer.
Thomasine and Wisdom Texts
The Gospel of Thomas (NHC II,2) preserves 114 sayings of Jesus without narrative framework–wisdom literature rather than mythology or systematic theology. The Teachings of Silvanus (NHC VII,4) and Sentences of Sextus (NHC XII,1) offer practical ethics without elaborate cosmology, bridging Gnostic and mainstream Christian moral teaching.
Apocalyptic and Unique Texts
The Apocalypse of Adam (NHC V,5) and Apocalypse of Paul (NHC V,2) present Jewish or Christian apocalyptic with Gnostic elements. Thunder: Perfect Mind (NHC VI,2) and Trimorphic Protennoia (NHC XIII,1) defy easy categorisation–they are poetic, performative, and paradoxical texts that transcend school boundaries. The Book of Thomas the Contender (NHC II,7) represents a distinctively encratite Thomasine tradition with radical ascetic demands.
Reading Strategically
Choose your entry point based on interest, then expand to other traditions, recognising the differences and appreciating the diversity [25].
Mythology and story: Start with Sethian texts–Hypostasis of the Archons, Apocryphon of John. These provide the dramatic narratives of cosmic fall and archonic incompetence that have captured the popular imagination.
Philosophy and system: Start with Valentinian texts–Gospel of Truth, Tripartite Tractate. These offer the most sophisticated theological construction in the library, engaging Platonic metaphysics and systematic cosmology.
Practice and experience: Start with Hermetic texts–Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth. These provide explicit ritual protocols for contemplative ascent and direct divine encounter.
Poetry and mysticism: Start with Thunder: Perfect Mind, Gospel of Philip. These offer the most immediately accessible and emotionally resonant entry points–paradoxical poetry and sacramental mysticism.
Understanding Sethian and Valentinian distinctions transforms reading from confusion to clarity. It reveals the Nag Hammadi Library not as a jumble of weird texts but as a collection of distinct spiritual traditions, each with its own coherence and beauty. For contemporary seekers, it offers not one Gnosticism but many–different paths to the same goal, different languages for the same experience, different maps of the same territory. The jar is open. The alternative archive has survived. These schools offer not heresy to be refuted but navigational provocations to be engaged [26].

Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main Gnostic schools in the Nag Hammadi Library?
The two largest schools are Sethian and Valentinian. Sethian texts include the Apocryphon of John, Hypostasis of the Archons, Zostrianos, and Allogenes–mythological narratives with Jewish apocalyptic roots. Valentinian texts include the Gospel of Truth, Gospel of Philip, Tripartite Tractate, and Treatise on the Resurrection–philosophical theologies with Christian sacramental emphasis. The library also contains Hermetic, Thomasine, wisdom, and apocalyptic texts that defy easy categorisation.
What is the difference between Sethian and Valentinian Gnosticism?
Sethianism derives from Jewish apocalyptic traditions, presents mythological narratives of cosmic fall and archonic imprisonment, and maintains an elitist soteriology where only the spiritual seed of Seth is saved. Valentinianism emerges from within Christianity, constructs systematic theologies of sacramental restoration, and maintains an inclusive soteriology where all three natures (spiritual, psychic, material) eventually return to the divine source through different paths.
Who was Valentinus and what did he teach?
Valentinus was a second-century Christian theologian who taught in Rome and was once a candidate for bishop. His system presents a complex cosmology of the Pleroma (divine fullness), the fall of Sophia, and the Saviour’s descent to restore the spiritual seed. He emphasised secret knowledge (gnosis) available to the pneumatic (spiritual) class, while recognising that the psychic class could be saved through faith and sacraments. His followers considered themselves part of the broader Church while reserving deeper mysteries for private meetings.
What are the key Sethian texts and their characteristics?
Key Sethian texts include the Apocryphon of John (creation myth and divine hierarchy), Hypostasis of the Archons (Eve as instructor), On the Origin of the World (Sophia’s triumph), Zostrianos (thirteen-aeon ascent), Allogenes (apophatic encounter), and Trimorphic Protennoia (three descents of divine wisdom). Characteristics include: Jewish roots, mythological narrative, cosmic pessimism, elitist soteriology, technical terminology (Barbelo, Autogenes, Yaldabaoth), and baptismal ascent rituals.
What are the five Valentinian sacraments?
The Gospel of Philip (NHC II,3) describes five sacraments: baptism, chrism (anointing), eucharist, redemption (apolytrosis), and the bridal chamber (nymphon). The bridal chamber is the highest and most mysterious sacrament, representing the restoration of primordial wholeness and the reunion of the initiate with their angelic counterpart. Valentinians regarded these as symbolic images of the internal process of redemption.
How should beginners approach the different Gnostic schools?
Beginners should choose entry points based on interest: mythology and story (start with Sethian Hypostasis of the Archons), philosophy and system (start with Valentinian Gospel of Truth), practice and experience (start with Hermetic Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth), or poetry and mysticism (start with Thunder Perfect Mind or Gospel of Philip). Then expand to other traditions, recognising the differences and appreciating the diversity rather than treating all texts as expressions of a single system.
Is Gnosticism a single coherent system or multiple traditions?
Gnosticism is not a single coherent system but a family of related traditions with distinct historical origins, literary forms, and ritual structures. The Nag Hammadi Library preserves Sethian, Valentinian, Hermetic, Thomasine, and other traditions that share common features (divine spark, gnosis, ascent) but differ significantly in cosmology, soteriology, and attitude toward the material world. Modern scholarship treats ‘Gnosticism’ as an umbrella term for this diversity rather than a unified sectarian identity.
Further Reading
These links connect the Gnostic schools to related resources within the ZenithEye library, providing pathways for deeper exploration of specific traditions, texts, and theological themes.
- Gnostic Schools: Sethians, Valentinians, and Hermetics — The comprehensive overview of all three major schools represented in the Nag Hammadi Library.
- Apocryphon of John: Gnostic Creation and Cosmology — Deep dive into the foundational Sethian text for divine hierarchy and demiurgical incompetence.
- Hypostasis of the Archons: Eve, Truth, and the Spiritual Instructor — Extended study of the most accessible Sethian narrative and its rehabilitation of Eve.
- Gospel of Truth: Poetics of Recognition — Analysis of the most beautiful Valentinian text and its meditation on error and return.
- Gospel of Philip: Sacrament, Eros, and the Bridal Chamber — Examination of Valentinian sacramental theology and the five mysteries.
- Tripartite Tractate: The Valentinian System Revealed — Study of the most systematic Valentinian cosmology and theology.
- Zostrianos: The Complete Journey Through the Thirteen Aeons — Detailed examination of the Platonizing Sethian ascent text and its complex cosmology.
- Allogenes: Sethian Ascent to the Unknowable One — Analysis of apophatic stillness and the boundary where celestial navigation ends.
- Codex II: The Crown Jewels — Overview of the codex containing the most important Sethian and Thomasine texts.
- Codex I: The Jung Codex — Overview of the codex containing the most important Valentinian texts and the Prayer of Paul.
References and Sources
The following sources support the claims and quotations presented in this article. All citations to the Nag Hammadi Library represent direct translations from the Coptic text as established in the standard critical editions.
Primary Sources and Critical Editions
- [1] Robinson, J.M. (Ed.). (1988). The Nag Hammadi Library in English (4th ed.). Brill.
- [2] Meyer, M. (Ed.). (2007). The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition. HarperOne.
- [3] Layton, B. (1987). The Gnostic Scriptures: A New Translation with Annotations and Introductions. Doubleday.
- [4] Waldstein, M. & Wisse, F. (1995). The Apocryphon of John. Brill.
- [5] Schenke, H.M. (1974). “Das Sethianische System nach Nag-Hammadi-Handschriften.” In Studia Coptica. De Gruyter.
Scholarly Monographs and Commentaries
- [6] Turner, J.D. (2001). Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Peeters.
- [7] Thomassen, E. (2006). The Spiritual Seed: The Church of the ‘Valentinians’. Brill.
- [8] Brakke, D. (2010). The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Harvard University Press.
- [9] Williams, M.A. (1996). Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton University Press.
- [10] Logan, A.H.B. (2006). The Gnostics: Identifying an Early Christian Cult. T&T Clark.
Comparative Studies and Thematic Analyses
- [11] Burns, D.M. (2014). Apocalypse of the Alien God: Platonism and the Exile of Sethian Gnosticism. University of Pennsylvania Press.
- [12] van den Broek, R. (2013). Gnostic Religion in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.
- [13] Rasimus, T. (2009). Paradise Reconsidered in Gnostic Mythmaking. Brill.
- [14] King, K.L. (2006). The Secret Revelation of John. Harvard University Press.
- [15] Markschies, C. (2003). Gnosis: An Introduction. T&T Clark.
